12/26/2019 0 Comments Persuasive Forms of Leadership Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 wordsPersuasive Forms of Leadership Paper - Essay Example Persuasive form of leadership can be used in different methods, that is, through “persuasive leadership and the power to influence†(Bethune, 2010, p.2). It is important that public leaders should be capable of reassuring the supporters of their plans and motives as well as be able to demonstrate concern in the public affairs or issues that affect the people. Leadership is a procedure, which facilitates a manager to direct, lead and influence the work as well as behavior of the concerned people towards achievement of particular goals under the required circumstances. It is the aptitude of the manager to encourage and boost the level of confidence of his subordinates as well as motivate them to do their best in order to fulfill the tasks at hand. Leadership research has integrated various qualities that show the significant differences between leaders and non-leaders as well as the impact it has on the supporters. It is a process that calls for publicly acceptable behavior containing personality traits that will help motivate individuals to reach an objective or goal. A lot of studies have shown that a person’s characteristics along with his or her abilities and skills can forecast leader effectiveness. For example, President Obama did this by executing the healthcare reform. He captured the attention of the US citizens by first stating that insurance firms are too powerful then he suggested a reform for this case. Next, the President foresaw the final result and then executed the planned reform or solution. In this particular case, the members or supporters of the President are affected by the chances of the healthcare reform. Thus, this paper talks about the different forms of persuasive leadership, the ways a leader may be persuasive and how he or she may facilitate change, as well as the two ways in which a leader is mainly persuasive and effective. Persuasive Forms of Leadership: Trust is one of the most significant elements in public leadership, especially when there arises a need for change. The followers or supporters of the leader need to be assured that the leader can deliver on his or her promises. If a supporter distrusts or doubts a leader then he may spread his doubts among others and soon the leader loses his power, thus leading to overall problems for the whole respective group. Trust is the first step in building relationships and when public leaders gain trust of the people they both gain mutual satisfaction. When trust is established, a leader can convince the followers that the job will get done as well as influence the opposing parties to believe in them. This indeed determines how constituents respond to change, proposed change, or the outcome. “Leadership is the potential to influence behaviour of others. It is also defined as the capacity to influence a group towards the realization of a goal†(“Management Study Guide,†n.d.). Leaders are necessary to expand future visions as well as to inspire the managerial members to want to attain the respective visions. Various forms of persuasive leadership include credibility, shared ground, compelling position, rewards and incentives, and commitment. All of these persuasive forms of leadership affect how supporters react to the intentions leaders are trying to communicate to the public. Furthermore, these persuasive forms are characteristics of leadership which supporters can observe and then develop their own opinion on the legality of data received. “A leader is involved in shaping and moulding the behaviour of the group towards accomplishment of organizational goals†(“Management Study Guide,†n.d.). The two ways in which a leader may imbibe the most effective persuasion in the public is through credibility and shared ground. Credibility:
0 Comments
Compare and contrast nazi and communist sport - Essay Example
For this conclusion to be arrived at before the introduction of the DRL, sporting skills were prior made a criterion for certain events, including school graduations and were also considered necessary qualification for certain other jobs as well as being necessary for admission to universities. In Europe too, emerged one other independent body governing sporting activities elsewhere in the region. This was the communism sport. The communist sports policy in Europe had dominated some of the largest parts of Europe especially during the cold war. However, this is no longer the case. It slowly collapsed giving rise to independent bodies that governed sorts throughout the countries of Europe. Communism sports however lives on in countries like China, Cuba and North Korea. Communism sport was not everywhere recognized or either practiced, in most of the national priorities of less advanced communist nations. Nations all around the world tend to recognize communist sport and more to it, adapting it. This in view of the research was mostly facilitated by its prior success soon after its establishment: this was particularly at the Olympics games that drew a considerably high level of attention worldwide. One particular and considerably remarkable but far-reaching aspect of the question at at hand, these referring to the communist sport was the evolution of an introduced model of sports that aimed at modernizing community. These too were intended at employing sports for utilarian purposes in view to promote health, defense, and hygiene issues among others. This newly introduced model that placed some attraction for nations in parts of Africa, Asia as well as Latin America was important. In majority of communist states, sports carried with it a huge revolutionary role of being an agent of social change with the state carrying the piloting role (Murray 73). Shifting sides to highlight the Nazi Sports, German sports in general, came to a clear rise in the sporting body, came up in the 1930s. This would have been prompted by several issues, among them a myth of Aryan racial superiority and physical power. The Olympics games then, being the first ever in history to cover live television. These provided an ideal setting that displayed a Nazi regime and more to that, what Hitler deemed to be his intended exploit. It would later be quoted that German sports had only one main objective, to strengthen the character of the Germans. This was to be by all means, from imbuing the country with a fighting spirit, termed to be necessary in the struggle for its existence. The Government then resulted to harnessed support for sport as part of its own drive to strengthen a particular race, to exercise political control over its citizens, in preparation of the youths for what they referred to as war. Close to all communist states faced problems of political stability. These would have its own consequences to Nation building at large, but in one way or another, had sports to be involved. As stated earlier, sports when facilitated by a common and stable value, experienced success repeatedly. With its involvement in Olympics gave a considerably high boost to this. Since a huge percentage of communist states were born in war torn situations, adverse poverty and the like. Sports |